Acronomic

View rule 111

111/1: On the free and frank discussion of rules - Immutable

If a rule-change as proposed is unclear, ambiguous, paradoxical, or destructive of play, or if it arguably consists of two or more rule-changes compounded or is an amendment that makes no difference, or if it is otherwise of questionable value, then the other players may suggest amendments or argue against the proposal before the vote. A reasonable time must be allowed for this debate. The proponent decides the final form in which the proposal is to be voted on and, unless the Judge has been asked to do so, also decides the time to end debate and vote.

By Admin, Proposed: 2003-09-20 12:09, Last Modified: 2003-09-20 11:09 (-1 years, 12 months later)