Note: all dates and times are from yahoo groups using a +0 time zone
| Proposal Name |
Proposal Body |
Proposal Status |
Votes Cast |
Notes |
|
| 1 |
"Proposal 1" |
The follow rule be created: 10.5 An office exists known as the 'Proposal Officer' The follow rule be created: 10.6 The job of the 'Proposal Officer' shall be to ensure proposals are correctly processed. The follow rule be created: 10.7 If the position of 'Proposal Officer' is vacated, then it is the duty of the 'Speaker' to call an election. The follow rule be created: 5.9 The owner of the proposal may process the proposal eyself. The follow rule be created: 5.10 If the owner has incorrectly processed a proposal it will be deemed to have expired. The follow rule be created: 5.11 A proposal is processed when it has been submitted to the mailing list with a subject heading as follows 'Proposal X', where X is the next number following in chronological order from the number of the last proposal. The following rule be deleted: 5.2 A pending proposal is a proposal which obeys the Three Sacred Laws, has been submitted to the official mailing list, and has not expired. The follow rule be created: 5.2 A pending proposal is a proposal which obeys the Three Sacred Laws, has been processed, and has not expired. |
Submitted on Thu, 10 Apr 2003 at 10:44am by Cassie Harley Not Pending due to TSL violations Expired on Thu, 17 Apr 2003 at 10:44am Destroyed by "Spring Cleaning" |
FOR: AGAINST: ABSTAIN: NO VOTE CAST: bd Cassie Craig Dr Ducker unlin_e |
|
| 2 |
Destroy 7.3 Create: 7.3 When a player deregisters, one of eir points is destroyed, and all eir points and things are distributed randomly between all other players. |
Submitted on Thu, 10 Apr 2003 at 09:35pm by bd Pending Expired on Thu, 17 Apr 2003 at 09:35pm Passed Destroyed by "Spring Cleaning" |
FOR: bd Craig Dr Ducker Josh unlin_e AGAINST: ABSTAIN: NO VOTE CAST: Cassie |
+1 Therm |
|
| 3 |
"Proposal 2" |
Rule 1.1 is to be deleted, and replaced with a new rule 1.1 reading "No proposal
may be submitted whose passage would directly increase the number of Things
in the game by more than one, unless it is explicitly permitted by rules
in the group headed FIRST SACRED LAW." Rule 1.2 is to be deleted, and replaced with a new rule 1.2 reading "A Registration Proposal may, if passed, increase the number of Things in the game." A rule 1.0 is to be added, reading "The rules in the group headed FIRST SACRED LAW are in temporary hiatus and will not be in force until such time as this rule is repealed." The comment on the FIRST SACRED LAW will be amended to read, "Without outside influence, the game cannot expand at a very high rate." Rule 4.0 will be deleted, but players are advised to continue to use short rules in case of SSL damage. |
Submitted on Thu, 10 Apr 2003 at 09:44pm by Craig Daniel Pending Expired on Thu, 17 Apr 2003 at 09:44pm Failed Destroyed by "Spring Cleaning" |
FOR: unlin_e AGAINST: Dr Ducker ABSTAIN: bd NO VOTE CAST: Cassie Craig |
|
| 4 |
"Proposal 3" |
CREATE Rule 5.9, "A therm is destroyed when a rule is created." |
Submitted on Thu, 10 Apr 2003 at 10:16pm by unlin_e Not Pending due to TSL violations Expired on Thu, 17 Apr 2003 at 10:16pm Destroyed by "Spring Cleaning" |
FOR: AGAINST: bd Dr Ducker ABSTAIN: NO VOTE CAST: Cassie Craig unlin_e |
|
| 5 |
"Proposal 3, Version 2" |
CREATE Rule 5.9, "When a rule is created, choose randomly between destroying
one therm and destroying two therms." |
Submitted on Thu Apr 10, 2003 at 10:28pm by unlin_e Not Pending due to TSL violations Expired on Thu Apr 17, 2003 at 10:28pm Destroyed by "Spring Cleaning" |
FOR: AGAINST: bd Dr Ducker ABSTAIN: NO VOTE CAST: Cassie Craig unlin_e |
|
| 6 |
"Proposal Dr. Ducker::1" |
Create a Rule: 5.9 When a rule is created, choose randomly between destroying one therm and destroying two therms. Destroy this Proposal. |
Submitted on Thu Apr 10, 2003 at 11:18pm by Doctor Ducker Pending Expired on Thu Apr 17, 2003 at 11:18pm Failed Destroyed by "Spring Cleaning" |
FOR: Dr Ducker AGAINST: bd unlin_e ABSTAIN: Craig NO VOTE CAST: Cassie |
Can't Pass |
| 7 |
"Let There be Josh" |
(a) Delete rule 9.1. (b) Create a new rule 9.1, which reads: "Rules, players, proposals, offices, points, and kudoses are Things." (c) Create one kudos, which belongs to Josh Millard. |
Submitted on Fri Apr 11, 2003 at 12:34am by Josh Millard (Registration Proposal) Pending Expired on Fri Apr 18, 2003 at 12:34am Passed Destroyed by "Spring Cleaning" |
FOR: bd Craig Dr Ducker AGAINST: ABSTAIN: NO VOTE CAST: Cassie unlin_e |
There may be a CJF on who owns this proposal? Can't Fail (unless it isn't a valid proposal) Josh is now a Player. + 1 Therm + 1 Kudos in Josh Millard's possession |
| 8 |
Craig's untitled prop (about randomizers) |
Rule 0.3 is destroyed and replaced with "0.3 To ensure that random selections occur without fraud, dice@pbm.com shall be used whenever anything random is called for." |
Submitted on Fri Apr 11, 2003 at 8:49pm by Craig Pending Expired on Fri Apr 18, 2003 at 8:49pm Passed Destroyed by "Spring Cleaning" |
FOR: bd Craig unlin_e AGAINST: ABSTAIN: NO VOTE CAST: Cassie Dr Ducker Josh |
+ 1 Therm |
| 9 |
"The Stenotype" |
Rule 10.3 is repealed and replaced with a new rule 10.3 reading as follows: 10.3 The Speaker shall be in charge of tabulating votes and making any random decisions that the rules do not ask another player to make. Rule 10.5 is created in the group OFFICES, reading: There is an office known as the Stenotype, whose posessor, the Stenographer, is responsible for tracking all past judgements and for assigning Judges and Appelate Justices. Rule 11.2 is repealed and replaced with the a new rule 11.2 reading: When a Call For Judgement is issued, the Stenographer shall randomly choose a player, who shall be known as the Judge. This proposal is destroyed. A random player is named Stenographer. |
Submitted on Fri Apr 11, 2003 at 8:56pm by Craig Not Pending due to TSL violations Expired on Fri Apr 18, 2003 at 8:56pm Destroyed by "Spring Cleaning" |
FOR: Craig AGAINST: ABSTAIN: NO VOTE CAST: bd Cassie Dr Ducker Josh unlin_e |
|
| 10 |
"Spring Cleaning" |
All non-pending proposals are destroyed. |
Submitted on Fri Apr 11, 2003 at 09:59pm by Craig Daniel Pending Expired on Fri Apr 18, 2003 at 9:59pm Passed Destroyed by "Spring Cleaning" |
FOR: bd unlin_e Craig AGAINST: Dr Ducker ABSTAIN: NO VOTE CAST: Cassie Josh |
+ 10 Therms - 10 Proposals + 1 point in Craig's possession |
| 11 |
"the stenotype take 2" |
Rule 10.3 is repealed and replaced with a new rule 10.3 reading as follows: 10.3 The Speaker shall be in charge of tabulating votes and making any random decisions that the rules do not ask another player to make. Rule 10.5 is created in the group OFFICES, reading: There is an office known as the Stenotype, whose posessor, the Stenographer, is responsible for tracking all past judgements and for assigning Judges and Appelate Justices. Rule 11.2 is repealed and replaced with the a new rule 11.2 reading: When a Call For Judgement is issued, the Stenographer shall randomly choose a player, who shall be known as the Judge. This proposal is destroyed. Proposal 2 is destroyed. A random player is named Stenographer. |
Submitted on Sun Apr 13, 2003 at 10:11pm by Craig Daniel Not Pending due to TSL violations Expired on Sun Apr 20, 2003 at 10:11pm. Destroyed by "the stenotype take 3" |
FOR: bd Craig AGAINST: ABSTAIN: NO VOTE CAST: Cassie Dr Ducker Josh unlin_e |
|
| 12 |
"Online polls are fun" |
Rule 5.6 is repealed and replaced with the following: "5.6 When a proposal becomes pending, the speaker shall create a poll where players are to cast their votes." |
Submitted on Sun Apr 13, 2003 at 10:21pm by Craig Daniel Pending Expired on Sun Apr 20, 2003 at 10:21pm. Failed |
FOR: Craig AGAINST: bd ABSTAIN: NO VOTE CAST: Cassie Dr Ducker Josh unlin_e |
|
| 13 |
untitled registration proposal from Ian Kelly. |
For each expired proposal in existence, a rule is created with the text "If
this proposal is destroyed by a proposal, a point shall be created in the
possession of the player who possesses the proposal.", and with a number
randomly chosen from the entire space of the real numbers not already
associated with a rule. No, perhaps that's not in the spirit of 0.2.
Let's just give them consecutive integers starting with 20. All expired proposals are destroyed. Rule 6.8 is created in the group "CHANGING THE GAMESTATE", reading "Immediately after a proposal expires, it is destroyed; this destruction is not considered to be a direct effect of the proposal." The number of Therms is set to forty-two. |
Submitted on Fri Apr 18, 2003 at 4:53am by Ian Kelly Pending Expired on Fri Apr 25, 2003 at 4:53am. Failed |
FOR: AGAINST: Dr Ducker ABSTAIN: Craig NO VOTE CAST: bd Josh unlin_e UNABLE TO VOTE: (Cassie) (Ian) |
+eprR (3) -eprPR (3) +1R (6.8) +1PL (Ian) ------------ +2 things +epr Therms (3) Indirect Effects: Ian Kelly gets a Point under rule 2.1 . All players recieve a point under rule 1.3 . Therms set to 0 under rule 1.3 . |
| 14 |
"the stenotype take 3" |
Rule 10.3 is repealed and replaced with a new rule 10.3 reading as follows: 10.3 The Speaker shall be in charge of tabulating votes and making any random decisions that the rules do not ask another player to make. Rule 10.5 is created in the group OFFICES, reading: There is an office known as the Stenotype, whose posessor, the Stenographer, is responsible for tracking all past judgements and for assigning Judges and Appelate Justices. Rule 11.2 is repealed and replaced with the a new rule 11.2 reading: When a Call For Judgement is issued, the Stenographer shall randomly choose a player, who shall be known as the Judge. This proposal is destroyed. the stenotype take 2 is destroyed. A random player is named Stenographer. |
Submitted on Sat Apr 19, 2003 at 12:22am by Craig. Pending Expired on Thu Apr 24, 2003 at 8:30pm. Passed Destroyed by "the stenotype take 3" |
FOR: bd Craig Josh unlin_e AGAINST: Dr Ducker ABSTAIN: NO VOTE YET: UNABLE TO VOTE: (Cassie) (Ian) |
-1R (10.3) +1R (10.3) +1R (10.5) -1R (11.2) +1R (11.2) -1PR (this) -1PR (steno take2) +1O (stenotype) ------------- -2R +3R -2PR +1O ----------- +0 things +4 Therms Indirect Effects: Craig gets a Point under rule 2.1 |
| 15 |
"transfers" |
Add a rule 6.8 in the group headed CHANGING THE GAMESTATE
reading "Any player may give any Thing e posesses to any other player by
stating eir intent to do so on the official mailing list." If Ian Kelly's registration proposal has passed, destroy Ian Kelly. Just kidding. Instead, if it has passed, destroy rule 20. If Ian Kelly's registration proposal has failed, destroy this proposal. |
Submitted on Tue Apr 22, 2003 at 2:56am by Craig. Pending Expired on Wed Apr 23, 2003 at 7:27am. Passed. Destroyed by this proposal. |
FOR: bd Craig unlin_e AGAINST: ABSTAIN: Dr Ducker Josh NO VOTE CAST: UNABLE TO VOTE: (Cassie) (Ian) |
+1R -1PR -------- +0 things +1 Therm Passage due to all eligible players voting. |
| 16 |
"eco nomic stimulus package" |
Destroy rule 9.1 Create a new rule 9.1 under the heading THINGS with the text: Rules, players, proposals, offices, coins, points, kudos, and The Bank are things. Destroy rule 9.7 Create a new rule 9.7 under the heading THINGS with the text: Any Thing which is not a player, Rule, or The Bank, must be possessed by a player or The Bank. Create a new rule 15.0 under the heading THINGS with the text: When the first proposal, after the creation of this rule, becomes expired, then at that time, The Bank will be created, 1,000,000,000 coins will be created in the possession of The Bank, and this rule will then be destroyed. The comment for the section THINGS will have the following text added to the end of it: Coins are intended to be a currency, and The Bank is a Thing which posesses all Coins not in the posession of a player. Destroy rule 14.2 For each point in existence, create a Coin in the posession of the same player. Destroy all points. For each kudos in existence, create a Coin in the posession of the same player. Destroy all kudoses. Create a new rule 15.1 under the heading THERMODYNOMIC with the text: This rule serves no purpose. Destroy rule 15.1 Why? Because we can. Let's do the happy-dance. Gosh, you can really tell I'm up too late causing economic activity. Imagine what Alan Greenspan goes through. Destroy rule 7.3 Create a new rule 7.3 under the heading DEREGISTRATION with the text: When a player deregisters, one of eir Coins is destroyed, and all eir things are distributed randomly between all other players. Destroy rule 1.3 Create a new rule 1.3 under the heading FIRST SACRED LAW with the text: Whenever a player Registers and the number of Therms exceeds the number of players by at least five, all players recieve a Coin and the number of Therms is set to zero. Destroy rule 2.1 Create a new rule 2.1 under the heading SECOND SACRED LAW with the text: Any player who submits a proposal that would destroy at least three Things recieves a Coin if that proposal passes. Players are hereby reminded that the above two changes alter the Three Sacred Laws. Thus, NO votes are vetoes and ABSTAIN votes are like normal NO votes. It is therefore important to vote, and since these are minor changes players are asked to ABSTAIN rather than vetoing the proposal unless they see some gaping flaw that was missed in earlier discussion. Of course, this paragraph has no force, but it is here as a reminder. |
Submitted on Tue Apr 22, 2003 at 3:18am by Craig. Pending Will expire on Tue Apr 29, 2003 at 3:18am. |
FOR: bd Craig unlin_e AGAINST: ABSTAIN: Dr Ducker NO VOTE YET: Josh UNABLE TO VOTE: (Cassie) (Ian) |
Votes AGAINST will automatically fail this proposal. R=Rules P=Points K=Kudos C=Coins p=# of Points k=# of Kudos c=# of Coins -1R (9.1) +1R (9.1) -1R (9.7) +1R (9.7) +1R (15.0) -1R (14.2) +pC -pP +kC -kK +1R (15.1) -1R (15.1) -1R (7.3) +1R (7.3) -1R (TSL1.3) +1R (TSL1.3) -1R (TSL2.1) +1R (TSL2.1) --------------- -7R +7R +(p+k)C -pP -kK ---------- +0 things +7+(p+k) Therms Indirect Effects: Craig gets a coin under rule 2.1 |
| 17 |
"minor ensp fix" |
If the proposal 'Eco Nomic Stimulus Package' has passed, destroy rule 9.1 and
create a new rule 9.1 with the text: Rules, players, proposals, offices, coins, and The Bank are things. |
Submitted on Tue Apr 22, 2003 at 12:23pm by Craig. Pending Will expire on Tue Apr 29, 2003 at 12:23pm. |
FOR: bd Craig unlin_e AGAINST: ABSTAIN: Dr Ducker NO VOTE YET: Josh UNABLE TO VOTE: (Cassie) (Ian) |
-1R +1R ________ +0 things +1 Therm |
| 18 |
"free trade" |
A rule 0.5 will be created, reading "There are no restrictions on players
entering the Nomic Market." ThermodyNomic will officially ask to be recognized as a participant by the Nomic Market. This proposal shall be destroyed. |
Submitted on Thu Apr 24, 2003 at 10:36pm by Craig. Pending |
FOR: Craig AGAINST: ABSTAIN: NO VOTE YET: bd Dr Ducker Josh unlin_e UNABLE TO VOTE: (Cassie) (Ian) |
|
| 19 |
"hot potatoes" |
The text "hot potatoes, " will be inserted before the word "and" in rule 9.1 and the resulting string will be known as NEWTEXT for the purposes of this proposal, so that we don't have to worry about other additions. Rule 9.1 will be repealed, and a new rule 9.1 whose text is NEWTEXT will be created. A group will be created with the heading POTATOES. A rule 15.0 will be created in that group with the text "Each Hot Potato must have its own unique name, and it must also have a description of when its effect occurs and what that effect is." The comment for POTATOES will be as follows: "The intent of these rules is that hot potatoes will be created which in some way harm their posessors, so that players will frantically give them to one another as the appointed time draws near." This proposal is destroyed. |
Submitted on Sun Apr 27, 2003 at 6:26pm by Craig. Pending |
FOR: bd Craig Dr Ducker Josh AGAINST: ABSTAIN: NO VOTE YET: unlin_e UNABLE TO VOTE: (Cassie) (Ian) |
Can't Fail. |
| 20 |
"cash flow" |
A hot potato shall be created, called the Potato of Cash Flow.
Its description shall be "Every time Yahoo automatically posts the ruleset, each Coin belonging to the posessor of this hot potato will be given to a random player."
The group owner, who is also the submitter of the proposal, promises not to change the frequency of such occurrences.
The Potato of Cash Flow shall begin in the posession of a random player. |
Submitted on Sun Apr 27, 2003 at 7:03 pm by Craig. Not Pending due to TSL violations |
FOR: Craig AGAINST: bd ABSTAIN: NO VOTE YET: Dr Ducker Josh unlin_e UNABLE TO VOTE: (Cassie) (Ian) |
|
| 21 |
"cash flow take 2" |
A hot potato shall be created, called the Potato of Cash Flow.
Its description shall be "Whenever the Potato of Cash Flow has gone two full weeks without causing any Things to be redistributed, the Potato of Cash Flow and each Coin belonging to its posessor will be given to a random player."
The Potato of Cash Flow shall begin in the posession of a random player.
This proposal shall be destroyed. |
Submitted on Sun Apr 27, 2003 at 7:38pm by Craig. Pending |
FOR: bd Craig Josh AGAINST: ABSTAIN: NO VOTE YET: Dr Ducker unlin_e UNABLE TO VOTE: (Cassie) (Ian) |
Can't Fail. |
| 22 |
FOR: AGAINST: ABSTAIN: NO VOTE YET: bd Craig Dr Ducker Josh unlin_e UNABLE TO VOTE: (Cassie) (Ian) |
| CFJ Body |
CFJ Status |
Judgement |
Appellate Judgement |
Notes |
|
| 1 |
14.1 This thing is a rule. |
Submitted on Thu 10 Apr 2003 at 11:42pm by bd. Assigned to Cassie for Judgement. |
FALSE |
||
| 2 |
14.2 This thing is a rule. |
Submitted on Thu 10 Apr 2003 at 11:42pm by bd. Assigned to unlin_e for Judgement. |
TRUE |
Written into the rules on Fri Apr 25, 2003 at 2:57pm |
|
| 3 |
14.3 This thing is a rule. |
Submitted on Thu 10 Apr 2003 at 11:42pm by bd. Assigned to Dr Ducker for Judgement. |
FALSE I do so due to the fact that this CFJ contains a number which is not necessarily the rule number under which it would be added according to rules 13.0 and 13.1 . |
||
| 4 |
14.4 This thing is a rule. |
Submitted on Thu 10 Apr 2003 at 11:42pm by bd. Assigned to Cassie for Judgement. |
FALSE |
||
| 5 |
14.5 This thing is a rule. |
Submitted on Thu 10 Apr 2003 at 11:42pm by bd. Assigned to Craig for Judgement. |
FALSE |
||
| 6 |
The title of section 14 is 'Extra rules'. The comment of section 14 is 'These are used in the early game to allow the ruleset to grow.' |
Submitted on Thu 10 Apr 2003 at 11:42pm by bd. Assigned to Dr Ducker for Judgement. |
FALSE There is no "section 14" at the time that this Call for Judgement was made, therefore neither sentence can be considered to be true. Had the CFJ referred simply to "a new section", or even better had it conditionally specified the creation of a section, then it is possible I could have judged this true. For instance if the Call had read: "If this sentence is added to the ruleset, then, at that time, a new group of rules is created, which is entitled 'Extra Rules', which contains the comment 'These are used in the early game to allow the ruleset to grow.', and which contains any rules whose number is greater than or equal to 14.0 and less than 15.0 ." |
||
| 7 |
The proposal, known as "Proposal 1", Submitted on Thursday, the 10th of April
2003 at 10:44am by Cassie Harley, was submitted illegally under Rule 1.1 . |
Submitted on Thu Apr 10, 2003 at 11:08pm by Dr Ducker. Assigned to bd for Judgement. Apealled on Sun Apr 13, 2003 at 9:05am by Dr Ducker. Assigned to Cassie, Craig and unlin_e for Appellate Judgement. |
FALSE |
Cassie: Craig: TRUE unlin_e: |
|
| 8 |
The proposal, known as "Proposal 3", Submitted on Thursday, the 10th of April
2003 at 10:16pm by unlin_e, was submitted illegally under Rule 1.1 . |
Submitted on Thu Apr 10, 2003 at 11:08pm by Dr Ducker. Assigned to Cassie for Judgement. |
|||
| 9 |
Rule 7.3 did not destroy any points upon Josh's deregistration of April 10,
2003, as there was nothing to destroy. |
i
Submitted on Fri Apr 11, 2003 at 3:39am by Craig. Assigned to unlin_e for Judgement. |
|||
| 10 |
Rule 7.3 decreased the number of points in the game by 1 upon
Josh's deregistration. A random player must therefore receive a negative number of points. |
Submitted on Fri Apr 11, 2003 at 3:39am by Craig. Assigned to bd for Judgement. Appealled on Fri Apr 18, 2003 at 4:57pm by Craig. Assigned to Cassie, Dr Ducker, and Josh for Appellate Judgement. |
TRUE It decreased his points by one, making his points negative. This was then distributed randomly. |
Cassie: Dr Ducker: FALSE In examining this CFJ, the question seems to be are the phrases, "one of eir points is destroyed" and "decreased the number of points in the game", equivalent. First, it seems to me that the text of rule 7.3 is specific to a point in the possession of the player in question, and not simply more generally within the game. If Josh had had a point when he deregistered then the effect of deregistration would trivially prove this CFJ true, however, since Josh did not have a point when he deregistered the question then appears to shift to whether a non-existant Thing can be destroyed. This issue seems to go to the spirit of the game as a whole, and it seems to me to be against that spirit to have "negative" Things. Additionally, I find the second sentence to be dangerously ambiguous as a stand-alone rule, which it would become if this CFJ is found true. Josh: FALSE |
Would have been written into the rules on Fri Apr 25, 2003 at 8:25pm |
| 11 |
When a proposal creates a rule which declares a Thing to exist, the proposal is
not seen as directly creating that Thing for the purposes of the First Sacred Law. |
Submitted on Sat Apr 12, 2003 at 2:00pm by Craig. Assigned to Dr Ducker for Judgement. Apealled on Sun Apr 13, 2003 at 2:45pm by Craig. Assigned to bd, Cassie, and unlin_e for Appellate Judgement. |
FALSE The sole purpose of the action which has instigated this Call for Judgement is to create a singular new Thing (The office of the Stenotype), therefore its creation would be a direct result of the passing of the proposal containing said action. If the action in question had specified a conditional, even one that was satisfied at the time of the containing proposals passage, then the creation of the office would not have been a direct result of the proposals passage. Even something as simple as: " Rule 10.5 is created in the group OFFICES, reading: At the time of this rules creation, a new office known as the Stenotype is created, whose possessor, the Stenographer, is responsible for tracking all past judgements and for assigning Judges and Appelate Justices. " This would also separate the office from its creating rule for SSL purposes. But, be careful with needing to modify the office later, 10.5 should not be destroyed and re-created with the same initial phrase, as that would create a second Stenotype, rather, a new rule would need to be added with the appropriate modifications contained within it. |
bd:FALSE Cassie: unlin_e:FALSE |
|
| 12 |
The statement of the judge in rule 11.5 refers only to the one which delivers
judgement. |
Submitted on Thu Apr 17, 2003 at 1:38am by Craig. Assigned to Dr Ducker for Judgement. |
FALSE |
||
| 13 |
A judge whose judgement has not been appealed may reverse eir judgement. |
Submitted on Thu Apr 17, 2003 at 1:38am by Craig. Assigned to bd for Judgement. |
FALSE |
||
| 14 |
A judge whose judgement has been appealed may reverse eir judgement until all
three appelate justices have returned a verdict. |
Submitted on Thu Apr 17, 2003 at 1:38am by Craig. Assigned to bd for Judgement. |
FALSE |
||
| 15 |
An appelate justice may reverse eir judgement until all three appelate
justices have returned a verdict. |
Submitted on Thu Apr 17, 2003 at 1:38am by Craig. Assigned to unlin_e for Judgement. |
FALSE |
||
| 16 |
A registration proposal is identical to a proposal in all respects, except, that until such time as it passes, it is not a Thing, and therefore need not be possessed by anyone or anything. A registration proposal which passes becomes a normal proposal, and thus a Thing, in the possession of the submitter of the proposal. A registration proposal which fails to pass also fails to become a Thing. |
Submitted on Fri Apr 25, 2003 at 8:11am by Dr Ducker Assigned to bd for Judgement. |
FALSE |
||
| 17 |
It is not necessary for a registration proposal to have a posessor. |
Submitted on Sat Apr 26, 2003 at 1:52am by Craig Assigned to bd for Judgement |
TRUE 8.x specifies that non-players can submit registration proposals. This takes precedence over 9.7 . |
Will be written into the ruleset on Sat May 3, 2003 at 1:57 am |
|
| 18 |