Court Appeal #1

At 02:49 on 3rd May, 1998, Q accused Black Francis of having broken the fourth law of RFN.

In his capacity as Supreme Court Judge, Q returned a verdict of False.

Court Appeal #2

At 22:38 on 1st December, 1998, CowJason accused illuminati fnord of having broken the fifth law of RFN.

In his capacity as Supreme Court Judge, Head returned a verdict of True.
He and Grimace (Law Talking Guy) agreed that 50 donuts should be transferred from illuminati fnord to Sinister Finnigan who was the victim.

Court Appeal #3

At 20:29 on 14th January, 1999, Head accused Sinister Finnigan of having broken the fourth law of RFN.

In his capacity as Supreme Court Judge, Head returned a verdict of True.
He and illuminati fnord (Law Talking Guy) agreed that 51 donuts should be transferred from Sinister Finnigan to illuminati fnord who was the victim.

Court Appeal #4

At 17:46 on 11th February, 1999, Cato accused Head of having broken the fourth rule [sic] of RFN.

In his capacity as Supreme Court Judge, illuminati fnord returned a verdict of False.

Court Appeal #5

At 23:34 on 16th September, 1999, CowJason accused CDC [sic] of having broken the fourth law of RFN.

Court Appeal #6

At 16:59 on 17th September, 1999, Spindly Grimace accused Uncle Psychosis of having broken the second law of RFN.

Court Appeal #7

At 19:22 on 10th October, 1999, Uncle Psychosis accused Head of having broken the fifth law of RFN.

Court Appeal #8

At 11:18 on 30th October, 1999, stuart accused 01000110011011110110111101101100 of having broken the laws [sic] of RFN.

Drunken Posse #1

At 22:19 on 3rd May Q formed a drunken posse. He attempted to lynch Q, the Law Talking Guy.

This action failed.

Drunken Posse #2

At 22:39 on 3rd May Q formed a drunken posse. He attempted to lynch Black Francis, the Supreme Court Judge.

This action failed.

Drunken Posse #3

At 03:29 on 20th July Q formed a drunken posse. He attempted to lynch Q, the Law Talking Guy.

This action is still to be resolved.