Dickens, David on 3 May 2002 14:42:16 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
RE: [nbo] Vote and Proposal from Jillian; Judgment |
I vote FOR Sorenson.1 BTW, one person is out of town this week. And I don't know where a couple of others are. I plan on a second recruitment drive next week. -----Original Message----- From: JillSorens@aol.com [mailto:JillSorens@aol.com] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 4:21 PM To: notbob-official@nomic.net Subject: Re: [nbo] Vote and Proposal from Jillian; Judgment Okay yeah I agree with Mr. Marsh here....what's with all the judicial rulings? Are you just trying to rack up points here Mr. Ogas and Mr. Dickens? Hmm hmm??? It's a conspiracy I tell you! :) And...and....okay so yeah, you don't like me submitting a bunch of rules at once even though it's so much more efficient...but I'll resubmit later that's cool...but...but...no voting on Sorenson.1? What's up with that? I know, you are all in deep pondering thought over it yes...that must be it. And...and...are we the only three people playing this game? TTYL, Silly Jilly [-- brought to you by notbob-official@nomic.net --] [- http://ddickens.pepperdine.edu/nomic/ for now -] [----- please, remember to trim the quotes -------] [-- brought to you by notbob-official@nomic.net --] [- http://ddickens.pepperdine.edu/nomic/ for now -] [----- please, remember to trim the quotes -------]