On Proposal #23

With the current board size and state (high population of units/buildings), this will cause Players to be stuck on one (or a few) squares. I like the direction this rule is going, but under the current board size, it's going to be rather restrictive. Hopefully that changes soon.

Furthermore, what happens if it passes, and a player is occupying the same square as another player's unit? Since players would be considered units, and Rule XII.4 forbids units owned by different players from occupying the same square, would this cause an immediate paradox? An official ruling of the implications would be nice (please Jeff, pretty please). :-)