Re: Problem[s?] with 63...?

Plus the whole removing units/buildings issue, which would affect: AAAAAAAAA!, Q-Thief, myself, sluissa, Le Roc, and Valenic (I think that's all who would be affected at the moment).

So not only does this proposal not add anything to the game (being that we no longer move based on rolls, but instead we jump), but it negatively impacts six players (of course, one of those is the one who proposed it)... probably enough right there to get this shot down even if it did work as intended (given that most people don't like losing the "fruits of their labour").

I don't see why it can't be reworded to work somehow under the deterministic motion method, and not penalize players by deleting their buildings/units.