[Nomic02] proposal

[Adam Biltcliffe]

>> My only concern with this is the definition of "possible
>> immediate consequence". Taking a particularly contrived example,
>> if Jota has the Magic Leech which steals brownie points from a
>> player when they enter the  same room as him, no-one else would
>> be able to enter his room.
>
> ... unless they can afford to be stolen from. Right, that's how I
> intend it to be.

No, what I meant was that a player without sufficient brownie points would 
be forbidden by this rule from entering Jota's location under any 
circumstances, which didn't seem to be the intent of the rule.

As you point out, though, a proposal for a Magic Leech would have to 
specify how it worked on a player without sufficient brownie points, and a 
similar rule would have to be made under my proposal. Therefore I'll vote 
aye on this one (If You Have To Ask, You Can't Afford It [Psmith]), declare 
my own (Things Can Only Get Better [jwalrus]) dead, and just grumble and 
moan if anything like my contrived example ever actually occurs.


jw