add proposal 336/0 l,a 12 Nov 2000 20:15:59 14 Nov 2000 04:05:32 Joel Uckelman unanimous consent fix 1. Add as the last sentence of the first paragraph of R210: "Motions to Add Players may be subject to three-day unanimous consent." 2. Replace all instances of "unanimous consent" in R303 with "two-day unanimous consent". 3. Replace the first instance of "Motion" in R230 with "Approvable Motion". ---- add proposal 337/0 l,a 13 Nov 2000 09:03:18 14 Nov 2000 04:05:32 The Kid Market Economy Create a rule entitled 'Market Economy' with the following text: "Agents within the game may have Objects associated with them such that the Agent is said to own that Object. Agents may only own Objects that are defined within the Ruleset. Agents may only gain ownership or lose ownership of objects in the manner defined in the Ruleset. Agents may own more than one of a specific type of object, unless prohibited elsewhere in the Ruleset. Agents may not own a negative or non-integral number of a specific type of object, unless allowed elsewhere in the Ruleset. Agents may freely trade in Objects by mutual agreement, unless prohibited elsewhere in the Ruleset. Objects that are not defined in the Ruleset may not be traded. Agents may not trade Objects in return for a Game Action or in return for the promise of a Game Action. [[eg. You can't offer a player some Object in return for them voting 'yes' on your proposal.]] All Players involved in a trade must submit the terms of the trade, or an agreement to previously submitted terms, to a public forum. The trade is deemed to occur when the Administrator (or other relevant Officer) publicly Recognises the trade. A trade must not occur if the resulting ownership of Objects produces an illegal or invalid game state, or if one of the Players involved in the trade would win the game as a result of the trade. Non-Player Agents may only participate in trades if it is specifically allowed elsewhere in the Ruleset." ---- add proposal 338/0 l,a 13 Nov 2000 16:47:55 14 Nov 2000 04:05:32 The Kid The Officer of Supreme Justice Create a new rule entitled 'The Officer of Supreme Justice' with the following text: "The Officer of Supreme Justice (OSJ) is an elected position. The OSJ is responsible for recognising RFJ's, selecting Judges and recusing Judges." Alter Rule 235 so that the words "the Administrator shall" are replaced with "the Officer of Supreme Justice shall". Alter Rule 238 so that the words "The Administrator shall" are replaced with "The Officer of Supreme Justice shall". Append the following text to the end of Rule 205: "During the first seven days of the fifth nweek of an Officer's Term [[ie. before the voting starts]] Players may put themselves forward for election to Office. The current Officer is automatically put up for election unless e publicly specifies otherwise. If no Player other than the current Officer puts themselves forward then the current Officer is automatically elected for another five nweeks and no election is required. In the event that the election is tied, the Administrator shall select one of the tied players to hold the Office, but the Term of Office is reduced to one nweek." In Rule 227 replace the line "3. all Ballot Item Elections are held again in the next nweek" with the following text: "3. Ballot Item Elections for non-vacant Offices are held again in the next nweek. The current Officer keeps their Office for another nweek. Candidates must put themselves forward for election again. 4. Ballot Item Elections for vacant Offices shall carry on the majority of votes cast." ---- add proposal 339/0 l,a 13 Nov 2000 17:32:18 14 Nov 2000 04:05:32 Potter modification of 302/0, Subliminal Religious Indoctrination I propose modifying the second paragraph of Rule 302/0 to read: "Anytime before the close of voting on proposals, a Player may make an RFJ accusing a another Player of Heresy by accusing em of being a Humble Disciple, and present the evidence. If the Player is found by the Judge to be Guilty of Heresy, then the Judge shall award the accuser with 30 points. " [[ As I saw it, the original rule had no provisions for deciding whether a Player had committed Heresy. This proposal should treat Accusations as traditional RFJs; if someone thinks they'd be better handled by some other method, let me know and I'll adjust the proposal accordingly ]] ---- add proposal 340/0 l,a 14 Nov 2000 03:24:45 14 Nov 2000 04:05:32 Joel Uckelman elective offices 1. Create a Rule entitled "Elective Offices" with the following text: "An Office filled through election is an Elective Office. An Office is Elective iff the Rules specify it to be so." 2. Create a Rule entitled "Elections" with the following text: "At any time prior to the start of voting during a nweek that is either a) the last nweek of an Elective Officer's Term of Office, or b) in which an Elective Office is vacant, any Player may nominate any Player, including emself, as a candidate for that Elective Office. The list of all candidates for an Office who did not decline nomination become the Ballot Issue for that Office at the start of that nweek's voting. Voters may cast a vote for only one candidate on each list for such Ballot Issues. Whichever candidate receives a plurality of the votes cast for an Elective Office shall assume that Office upon the expiration of the erstwhile Officeholder's Term." 3. Capitalize every instance of "elected" in R202. ----