Current Proposals:

Proposal hirsch.8 (Thomas)
Proposed 23 June 2000
Steadiness: 1
Current Status: pending

Rename players.listmaintenance to players.list.maintenance
Rename Gnomes.mantainance.Mines to Gnomes.mines
Repeal winning.list
Repeal winning.score
Create

_Gnomes (Steadiness 0.6)________________________________________
Gnomes are beings. They may be owned by players.

Proposal jeff.7 (Jeff Weston)
Proposed 27 June 2000
Steadiness: 1
Current Status: pending

Create a new rule proposals.active with steadiness = 1 that reads:

Any proposal that has been made but has not succeeded or failed is considered an active proposal. The set of proposals that are considered active are referred to as active proposals within the rules.

Proposal zagarna.10 (Zagarna II)
Proposed 28 June 2000
Steadiness: 0.5
Current Status: pending

repeal rule proposals.conflicts

Proposal zagarna.11 (Zagarna II)
Proposed 28 June 2000
Steadiness: indeterminate
Current Status: pending

Jeff is the Chief Justice for this week

Proposal jeff.9 (Jeff Weston)
Proposed 28 June 2000
Steadiness: 1
Current Status: pending

Create a new rule called rules.ammendment with steadiness = 1 that reads:

When a rule is ammended, it retains its old steadiness value unless a new one is specified in the proposal that ammended it.

Proposal jeff.10 (Jeff Weston)
Proposed 28 June 2000
Steadiness: 1
Current Status: pending

Ammend rules.spelling to read in full:

If a spelling or grammatical error is discovered in a rule in the current ruleset, the rule may be corrected if the correction does not change the rule's meaning and targets. The amendment shall be communicated to all players.

A player may object to a correction made in this fashion by communicating his or her objection to all players. If one or more players object to a correction, it is removed. That same correction cannot be made again via this process. [However, a proposal containing the correction can still be made.]

Proposal hirsch.17 (Thomas)
Proposed 28 June 2000
Steadiness: 1
Current Status: pending

Create:

_proposal.dependencies_ (S=1) _______________
A proposal may specify that it depends on the passages or the failures of one or more other proposals. In that case it will remain active until the proposals it depends on passed or failed. The proposal will fail if the specified actions did not occur, even if the required number of voters supported it.

Ammend rule proposals.passage to read in full:

A proposal is adopted, if enough players voted for the proposal, at least two players voted SUPPORT and the number of players voting SUPPORT divided by the number of players not voting ABSTAIN is greater than or equal to the proposal's steadiness. The change proposed shall then be made, unless such change is forbidden by the rules. If the proposal has any dependencies that are still active proposals, the change proposed shall be delayed until those dependencies are resolved.

 In the context of this rule, enough players have voted either if all players cast one vote or if the proposal may not be defeated even if all remaining players cast OPPOSE.

Proposal jeff.11 (Jeff Weston)
Proposed 28 June 2000
Steadiness: 1
Current Status: pending

Ammend rule tabulator to keep its current steadiness and read in full:

The Tabulator shall count all votes cast on each proposal. When a particular proposal passes or fails, the Tabulator shall publish the results of the vote to all players. All results published by the Tabulator are for informational purposes only.