BPH 101: Called by The Gingham Wearer on Slakko at:
Results: The Hearing voted 3-1 for "It seemed perfectly alright to me." at Mon, 23 Feb 1998 12:52:32 -0500
BPH 102: Called by Slakko on The Gingham Wearer at:
Results: The Hearing voted 5-0 for "It was obviously in violation!" at Sun, 22 Feb 1998 18:36:00 -0500
BPH 103: Called by Rex Mundi on Slagothor at: Thu, 19 Feb 1998 16:19:06 -0500
Message in question:
>Oh, c'mon Slakko, now you're just being Silly (nudge nudge,
>wink wink ;-)
Results: The Hearing voted 4-0 for "It was obviously in violation!" at Mon, 23 Feb 1998 13:27:51 -0500
BPH 104: Called by Slakko on Wild Card at: Sun, 08 Mar 1998 04:25:07 -0500
Message in question:
> So what (speaking as an interested party :-) was the result?
Results: The Hearing voted 9-1 for "It was obviously in violation!" at Wed, 11 Mar 1998 06:01:16 -0500
BPH 105: Called by Hubert on The Gingham Wearer on Fri, 13 Mar 1998.
Message in question:
> Crusader. I still think I'm eligible for a cheese though (and had already
> pointed this out to Alfvaen :-) though, because I have held five offices
Results: The Hearing voted 1-0 for "It was obviously in violation!" at Sun, 22 Mar 1998 23:37:54 -0500
BPH 106: Called by Rex Mundi on Hubert at Sun, 03 May 1998 20:31:33 -0400.
Message in question:
>this from happening again. (Besides repealing the damn things, Slakko.
>:-) Should R597 automatically append a "There exists a Frankenstein
Results: The Hearing voted 12-2 for "It was obviously in violation!" at Thu, 07 May 1998 11:33:48 -0400
BPH 107: Called by Ayla on K 2.
Results: The Hearing voted 10-4 for "It was obviously in violation!" at Fri, 15 May 1998 09:54:36 -0400.
Page by: Joseph DeVincentis, Aaron Humphrey,
Duncan Richer.